Goodbye Rotaract; Hello Rotary


by John Borst, District 5550, Communications*

Certainly, one of the most unexpected and welcome decisions emanating from the 2016 Council on Legislation is the decision to offer simultaneous membership in Rotaract and Rotary.

A review of the proposed “enactments” shows that the suggestion came from the RI Board of Directors. The idea is first mentioned in PROPOSED ENACTMENT 16-36  “To allow for flexibility in membership and classification” where it is used as an example of an exception (page 102) Examples of such flexibility might include: “Allowing Rotaractors who meet the club’s criteria for membership to join a Rotary club while retaining their membership in Rotaract as well.”

The specific change is PROPOSED ENACTMENT 16-40 “To allow Rotaractors to be active members”.

The rationale for this change provided in the CoL documentation is

” The effect of this enactment is to establish a stronger relationship between Rotaractors and RI and strengthen both the Rotaract movement and RI.  Program participants will be able to have simultaneous affiliations with a Rotary club and a Rotaract club.  As members of the family of Rotary, Rotaractors are committed to the world community, share Rotary’s vision of furthering service, world understanding, and peace, and may more easily transition to RI membership.” (Page 115)

It is interesting that to enact this change the following sentence had to be deleted in a number of articles starting with Article 4.040 Dual Membership “No person shall simultaneously hold active membership in a club and membership in a Rotaract club.”

The question I ask myself at this juncture is this the beginning of the end of Rotaract? And is this the real intended end the Board of Directors had in mind?

Personally, I have never understood the purpose of Rotaract. I see it as an encumbrance from an era when stratifying on the basis of age was an accepted practice. After-all young people could not run a company or manage a successful business before reaching the mature old age of 35 could they. As for university students, they weren’t even considered worthy of the term adulthood.  Of course, there have been just too many examples from this post-industrial 21st  Century which have put a lie to such beliefs.

There is also the little problem that Rotary is struggling to find younger members especially in a post-modern society where even neoliberal capitalism accepts the need for “diversity” and “inclusiveness”.

No-Yes-Merged-logosHence it should come as no surprise that as Rotary changed to give clubs more flexibility over membership and meetings that the merging and mingling of Rotaractors and Rotarians would naturally follow.

Rotary’s path to change is not generally revolutionary but evolutionary. Instead of just out-right declaring Rotaractors Rotarians they could choose to be both. Hybridity would be encouraged but discrimination under the old hierarchy would be allowed to continue where members so wished.

This has been the classic response to change within Rotary. Yes CoL reluctantly accepted gender equality when pushed by the U.S. Supreme court to accept it, but there have been no repercussions for those 6000 plus clubs who have yet to embrace it.

As Rotary clubs become more flexible and the differences between Rotaract and Rotary disappear I suspect  Rotaractors will eventually ask, “Why should we belong to a second class “Rotary” club when we can belong to the real thing; in fact why don’t we just rebrand ourselves Rotarians”

The reason I likely feel this way is because I live in a town of about 8,000 with just one Rotary club. The nearest alternative club is 100 km. away. We have always welcomed members under 35; in fact we go out of our way to recruit them. Our club is approaching its 75th anniversary. It has a good mix of ages and is nearly equally split by gender. In my opinion that is the model I hope all clubs will achieve one day.

  • The above opinion is that of the author and does not represent the opinion of Rotary District 5550.

About John Borst

John Borst’s career in education spans the years 1960 to 1996. During those 36 years, he spent an equal amount of time working int he English language, Public and Catholic school boards. Borst taught in both elementary and high school environments. Positions of responsibilities held included department head in Geography, curriculum coordinator of Social and Environmental Studies, Principal, Education Officer with the Ministry of Education, Superintendent of Schools, and Superintendent of Student Services. Borst retired in 1996 as Director of Education for the legacy Dryden Board of Education. During this time, Borst has lived in the Ontario communities of Brampton, Toronto, Newmarket, Thunder Bay, Aurora and Dryden. Currently, Borst splits his time between Dryden and Toronto. Since retirement, Borst has served as a Supervisory Officer with a remote School Authority; been a freelance writer of articles on education in particular for Education Today, the magazine of the Ontario Public School Boards’ Association (OPSBA); founded and edited from 2006 - 2010 the Education blog Tomorrow’s Trust: A Review of Catholic Education; and from 2003-2010 was a trustee of the Northwest Catholic District School Board.
This entry was posted in Editorials and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Goodbye Rotaract; Hello Rotary

  1. Maddy Webber says:

    While I am thrilled with the new dual membership and agree with the contents above.
    I still feel we are short sighted by by restricting the Rotaract age to 30 years and not 35years.
    Often the membership fees of Rotary are the reason why some young people do not join Rotary.
    Rotaract is a transition stage for people who are not certain if they can commit fully to Rotary, a chance to see if this is what they want without incurring big expenses.
    Often it is the only chance low income community minded young people have an opportunity to be a part of Rotary.
    Often once they ‘age out’, they are lost to Rotary because they no longer can afford the dues.
    I personally would have loved a ruling which extended ages of Rotaractors to 35 with the option of dual membership.
    Rotarians always had the option to be a part of Rotaract while being Rotarians, Rotaractors have always welcomed Rotarian interest and participation, not dictation.

    Dual membership is a welcome ruling and hopefully the flexibility offered by clubs will be accompanied by more flexibility in older Rotarians attitude towards their younger club members.

  2. Hemant Amin says:

    Good idea, radical but why have a two tier system? If we can come up with an answer to the membership cost issue then we should Get On With IT!

    Hemant Amin
    Newbury Rotary Club, England, UK
    District 1090

  3. Jason van Ritten says:

    As a fomer Rotaractor (10 years) and current Rotarian (10 years) I have evolved my thinking a lot in regards to Rotaract. I think we are moving to a future where Rotaract will be gradually subsumed by Rotary – and I think that is healthy. We are not there yet however! The steps taken by the CoL are good ones in my view. We should also consider the other outcomes of the CoL – changes in the frequency of meetings, definition of who could be a member and normalisation of e-clubs with non e-clubs are hopefully going to encourage more younger people to join. The more the Rotary Clubs evolve to models including many that look a lot like Rotaract, the better for our organisation in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s